The past, present, and the future of disc nucleus replacement. A systematic review of a large diversity of ideas and experiences.
Systematic Review
Disc nucleus replacement (NR) is a challenging surgical technique used as a medical treatment for early-stage disc herniation to restore disc height and the biomechanical function of a motion segment, which may reduce low back pain. The surgical procedure involves the removal and replacement of the degenerated nucleus pulposus with a substitute by accessing the annulus fibrosos via a created hole. Over the decades, nucleus replacement has been an important issue, leading to the development of different substitute alternatives. The first ideas are dated to the 1950s and since then, more than a hundred nucleus replacement concepts can be identified. There were numerous attempts and several clinical trials; however, after more than 70 years of research, no gold standard for nucleus pulposus replacement has been identified. This review aims to collect the different nucleus replacements reported in the literature, thus understanding what failed, what could be improved and what are the opportunities for the future. A systematic review of the literature was performed using a keyword-based search on PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus databases to detect all nucleus replacements presented in the past by clinicians and engineers. Several studies were extracted from which the main nucleus replacements over the years were investigated, including the ones that received CE mark, FDA approval, or IDE approval and, also those involved in clinical trials. A total of 116 studies were included in this review. The extracted data concern the nucleus replacements proposed over the years to create a historical background as complete as possible, including their mechanical and biomechanical characterization and the clinical trials conducted over the years. Nucleus disc arthroplasty has been explored for many years. Unfortunately, even today there is still nothing safe and definitive in this surgical practice. This review provides an overview of the nucleus replacement history. A breakthrough could be the improvements in technologies for the annulus fibrous closing or sealing and the tissue engineering and medical regenerative techniques which could certainly ensure a higher NR implantation success rate in the future of this clinical treatment. It is not yet clear what is the future of this clinical practice. Only scientific research can answer the question: is the nucleus replacement still a possible clinical solution?
